UI Health Care Took an Agile Governance Approach
After an initial pilot with Nabla in 2024, UI Health Care quickly followed up with an enterprisewide rollout across the 862-bed academic medical center rather than smaller deployments by specialty. A follow-up survey in 2025 found that since adoption of the ambient solution, there was a 26% reduction in burnout and a 14% increase in satisfaction with the electronic health records system. The results were published in a KLAS Arch Collaborative case study.
Healthcare’s interest in ambient solutions, powered by artificial intelligence, doesn’t seem to be fading any time soon. In fact, compared with the rollout of EHRs, Blum says, ambient tools have been “the fastest adoption of a technology I've ever seen.”
The vendor landscape has changed drastically since 2022, when Microsoft completed its acquisition of leading ambient solution provider Nuance Communications and ChatGPT later launched to the public. Now, there are native generative AI features in EHR platforms such as Epic and Oracle Health. Vendors and providers alike have become more aware of compliance concerns. Amid this transformation, Blum says, UI Health Care has always had a robust governance process for acquiring new technology.
GET EXPERT HELP: Transform patient care with data and artificial intelligence.
What set the organization apart was that, earlier, on the cusp of the public generative AI boom, UI Health Care already had a multidisciplinary group with additional AI expertise that could ask specific questions about how a model works, model training, performance characteristics and more so that the health system could make informed decisions about its purchases. If an ambient solution was trained only on a limited data set relevant to one hospital, that was likely not the right product. The group helped UI Health Care stay agile as more refined solutions entered the market.
This approach worked well in the beginning, Blum says, but as UI Health Care matures its AI governance, it needs to move away from point solutions toward a platform approach.
“There's model drift, there's utilization metrics you need to be looking for, so we're now looking at re-engineering our governance, which had this lightweight, nimble approach, to become more focused on how we acquire solutions that are platform-based, or how we identify where a tool we already have may address the problem rather than just going out and buying another solution. That's a work in progress right now,” Blum says.
He expects this evolution to continue over the next 12 to 18 months across the entire University of Iowa ecosystem, not just the healthcare segment.
How UI Health Care Narrowed Its Choices
One of the requirements that UI Health Care had for its ambient solution was that the vendor was not allowed to train its models on the health system’s data. Blum says that quickly narrowed the field at the time on who the organization could partner with.
User-friendliness and adaptability were other features that helped UI Health Care make its decision. The chosen solution was not only easy to adopt, Blum says, but also had potential for wider use beyond clinicians, such as physical therapists.
“It was so lightweight and easy to install because it's a cloud-based product that uses essentially a small HL7 feed and has native Epic interchange,” he adds. “We were up and running in a couple of days. We needed to change very little in our IT environment to make it work.”
